Conceptualizing Reading in the Qur’an: A Thematic (Maudhu‘i) Tafsīr Analysis
The Lexical Spectrum and Semantic Hierarchy of Reading in the Qur’an Objects, Subjects, and Methodologies of Reading: An Ontological and Epistemological Analysis The Synthesis of a Conceptual Model: Integral Reading as a Qur’anic Epistemology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71456/jis.v4i1.1650Keywords:
Epistemology of Reading;, Thematic Tafsir;, Qur’anic Exegesis;, Integrative Islamic Education;, Qur’anic LexicalAbstract
This study aims to reconstruct the conceptualization of reading in the Qur’an, which is often reduced to mere technical literacy, while the sacred text offers a holistic-integrative paradigm. Departing from the problem of fragmentation in previous studies that are partial and have not touched the semantic integrity of key lexical networks (qara’a, tala, darasa, etc.), this research addresses the urgency of theoretical-practical needs to formulate a coherent Qur’anic epistemology of reading as a foundation for Islamic philosophy of science and education. Using a rigorous thematic ( maudhu’i ) tafsir method, an exhaustive thematic exploration of all related verses, semantic-contextual analysis, and synthesis of a conceptual model were conducted. The novelty of the research lies in three aspects: the application of rigorous maudhu’i procedures for complex themes, comparative-interconnective semantic analysis between lexicons, and the construction of a theory in the form of a Multilayered Epistemology of Qur’anic Reading Model (Technical-Procedural, Performative-Reflective, and Contemplative-Constructive Layers). The results indicate that reading in the Qur’an is an active, hierarchical epistemology with dual objects ( qauliyah and kauniyah verses), an ideal subject ( ulul albab ), and an integrative-dialogical methodology, aiming to produce beneficial knowledge ( ‘ilm nāfi’ ) and universal benefit ( rahmatan lil ‘ālamīn ). This model serves as an operational framework for revitalizing an integrated Islamic knowledge paradigm.
References
‘Ashur, I. (1984). Al-Taḥrīr wa al-Tanwīr. Dār al-Tunisiyyah.
Abū al-Su‘ūd al-‘Imādī. (1971). Irshād al-‘Aql al-Salīm ilā Mazāyā al-Kitāb al-Karīm Juz VI. Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-‘Arabī.
Abū Ḥayyān al-Andalusī. (1993). al-Baḥr al-Muḥīṭ fī al-Tafsīr (Vol. 2). Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Al-Aṣfahānī, A.-R. (2013). Mu‘jam Mufradāt Alfāẓ al-Qur’ān al-Karīm (Bei (ed.)). dar al kutub al ilmiyah. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=jf1sDwAAQBAJ
Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1993). Islam and Secularism. International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization (ISTAC). https://doi.org/10.15476/ELTE.2021.128
al-Dīn Muḥammad ibn Ibrāhīm al-Shīrāzī, Ṣadr. (1981). al-Ḥikmah al-Muta‘āliyah fī al-Asfār al-‘Aqliyyah al-Arba‘ah Jilid I. Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-‘Arabī.
Al-Fārābī. (1906). Kitab ara’ ahl al-madinah al-fadilah. Muṣṭafá Fahmī al-Kutubī.
Al-Fārābī, A. N. M. ibn M. (1968). Risālah fī al-‘Aql. In M. T. Dānishpazhūh (Ed.), Rasā’il al-Fārābī al-Falsafiyyah (pp. 31–38). Dār al-Fikr al-‘Arabī.
Al-Ghazālī, A. Ḥāmid M. ibn M. (2005). Iḥyā’ ‘Ulūm al-Dīn Jilid III. Dār al-Ma‘rifah.
Al-Qurṭubī. (1964). Al-Jāmiʿ li-Aḥkām al-Qurʾān (2nd ed., Vol. 14). Dār al-Kutub al-Miṣriyyah.
Armayanto, H. (2022). Jurnal Kajian Al-Quran dan Tafsir Konsep Kalimat Sawa ’ dalam Hubungan Antaragama : Analisis Komparatif Pandangan Hamka dan Nurcholish Madjid Al-Misykah : Jurnal Kajian Al-Quran dan Tafsir Vol 3 No 2 ( 2022 ). 3(2), 199–223.
Bickle, J. (2003). Philosophy and Neuroscience: A Ruthlessly Reductive Account. Springer.
Flick, U. (2018). An Introduction to Qualitative Research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Gaffar, A., & Anees, M. (2025). Inclusive Tawhid as an Epistemology of Islamic Education. FIKROTUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Manajemen Islam, 15(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.32806/jf.v15i1.833
Hakim, L. N. (2019). METODE PENELITIAN TAFSIR. Noer FIkri.
Ibn Manẓūr. (1997). Lisān al-‘Arab (Vol. 11). Dār Ṣādir.
Ibn Sīnā, A. ‘Alī al-Ḥusayn ibn ‘Abd A. (2010). al-Shifā’ (Vols. 1--4). Manshūrāt Jāmi‘at al-Muṣṭafā.
Izutsu, T. (2002). Ethico-Religious Concepts in the Qur’an. McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Khaldun, I. (1377). Muqaddimah. Muassasah Risalah.
Muhammad Muhammad Diaz Supandi Muhammad Abdan Khoiri, I. G. A. A. A. M. M. A. N. (2025). Revisiting Deep Ecology through Qur’anic Exegesis: Comparative Perspectives from al-Sha‘rawi and Fazlun Khalid. Zad Mufassirin, 7(5), 306–326.
Mujahidin, A. (2022). Metode penelitian Kualitatif Bidang Tafsir Al-Qur’an. IAIN Ponorogo Press.
Mustaqim, A. (2014). Metode Penelitian Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir. Idea Press.
Nasr, S. H. (1996). Religion and the Order of Nature. Oxford University Press.
Putra, A., Malia Hayati, S., & Yasir, M. (2021). Reinterpretation Of Polygamy Verses. Qof, 5(2), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.30762/qof.v5i2.8
Razi, F. (1862). Mafātīḥ al-ghayb Jilid III. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.
Romdoni, M. P. (2023). Asbab al-Nuzul in Surah Al-Baqarah (2): Mulla Huwaisy Perspective of Critical Matn and Sanad. Jurnal Iman Dan Spiritualitas, 3(3), 521–530. https://doi.org/10.15575/jis.v3i3.30400
Shihab, M. Q. (2019). Wawasan Al-Qur’an. Mizan.
Supandi, M. D., Syaputra, M. B., Afthon, H., Pradana, A. R., & Munawar, A. M. (2025). Caliphate Paradigm as an Antithesis to Imperialism: A Theological and Geopolitical Analysis in the Discourse of Islamic and Western Civilizations. JIS: Journal Islamic Studies, 3(2), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.71456/jis.v3i2.1394
Thabathaba’i, M. H. (1955). Al-Mizan fi tafsiri’l-Qur’an. Dar al-Kitab al-Islamiyah,. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32493/amq.v2i2.44562
Triono, A. (2023). Sosioneurosains Perspektif Al-Qur`an: Studi Perilaku Manusia dan Faktor-Faktor yang Memengaruhinya. Pascasarjana Universitas PTIQ Jakarta.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Diaz Supandi, M. Bili Syaputra, Ahnaf Falih, Muhammad Faid Ghathfan Haryudha, & Alfan Arif Rabbani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.








