Analisis Manajemen Persediaan dan Implikasinya terhadap Kinerja Operasional UD Montolutusan Manado

Rendi Eka Saputra; Merlyn Mourah Karuntu; Shinta Jeanete Camelia Wangke

doi:10.71456/sur.v5i1.3006

Authors

Rendi Eka Saputra Universitas Sam Ratulangi
Merlyn Mourah Karuntu Universitas Sam Ratulangi
Shinta Jeanete Camelia Wangke Universitas Sam Ratulangi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71456/sur.v5i1.3006

Keywords:

Manajemen Persediaan, Economic Order Quantity (EOQ), Safety Stock, Reorder Point (ROP), Kinerja Operasional

Abstract

Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh pengelolaan persediaan pada UD Montolutusan Manado yang masih dilakukan secara sederhana berdasarkan pengalaman dan perkiraan, sehingga berpotensi menimbulkan kekurangan persediaan serta menghambat pemenuhan permintaan pelanggan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penerapan manajemen persediaan, mengidentifikasi kendala yang dihadapi, mengkaji implikasinya terhadap kinerja operasional, serta menyusun rekomendasi pengendalian persediaan. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif dengan teknik pengumpulan data melalui wawancara, observasi, dan dokumentasi. Informan penelitian berjumlah lima orang yang terdiri atas pemilik, manajer, kepala bagian operasional, karyawan produksi, dan karyawan operasional pengantaran. Analisis data menggunakan model Miles, Huberman, dan Saldaña, sedangkan metode Economic Order Quantity (EOQ), Safety Stock, dan Reorder Point (ROP) digunakan sebagai alat analisis pengendalian persediaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengelolaan persediaan telah mencakup perencanaan, pengadaan, penyimpanan, penggunaan, pengendalian, serta pencatatan dan pengawasan, tetapi belum didukung sistem pengendalian yang terstruktur. Analisis EOQ menghasilkan rekomendasi jumlah pemesanan ekonomis sebanyak 328 sak semen, 16 dam truk pasir, dan 8 dam truk teras untuk setiap pemesanan. Analisis Safety Stock merekomendasikan persediaan pengaman sebanyak 6 sak semen, sedangkan analisis ROP merekomendasikan pemesanan kembali ketika persediaan semen mencapai 30 sak. Penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa manajemen persediaan berkaitan dengan kelancaran produksi, pemenuhan permintaan pelanggan, ketepatan waktu, kualitas, dan efisiensi penggunaan sumber daya. Namun, karena rekomendasi tersebut belum diterapkan selama periode penelitian, dampaknya terhadap peningkatan kinerja operasional belum dapat dipastikan. Oleh karena itu, perusahaan disarankan menerapkan metode pengendalian persediaan secara terukur dan meningkatkan sistem pencatatan persediaan.

References

Al Naimi, M., Faisal, M. N., Sobh, R., & Bin Sabir, L. (2022). A systematic mapping review exploring 10 years of research on supply chain resilience and reconfiguration. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 25(8), 1191–1218. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2021.1893288

Alam, M. K. (2021). A systematic qualitative case study: Questions, data collection, NVivo analysis and saturation. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 16(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-09-2019-1825

Al-Hakimi, M. A., Goaill, M. M., Al-Hattami, H. M., Murshid, M. A., & Moghalles, S. A. M. (2023). Improving operational performance of manufacturing SMEs: The interactive effect of technical and human lean practices. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 40(4), 1092–1110. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-12-2021-0443

Durugbo, C. M., & Al-Balushi, Z. (2022). Supply chain management in times of crisis: A systematic review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-022-00272-x

Gera, R., Yadav, R., Khera, G. S., Saxena, A., Chadha, P., & Dixit, S. (2022). A systematic literature review of supply chain management practices and performance. Materials Today: Proceedings, 69(2), 624–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.10.203

Lean strategy in SMEs: Inventory leanness, operational leanness, and financial performance. (2024). The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 40(2), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2024.02.003

Lehtimäki, H., Heikkinen, A., & Kujala, J. (2022). Case study method in addressing sustainable innovation in business and management. South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/22779779221080577

Liu, F., Yu, Y., Fang, Y., Zhu, M., Shi, Y., & Xiao, S. (2024). Lean strategy in SMEs: Inventory leanness, operational leanness, and financial performance. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 40(2), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2024.02.003

Mtisi, S. (2022). The qualitative case study research strategy as applied on a rural enterprise development doctoral research project. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221145849

Panigrahi, R. R., Shrivastava, A. K., & Kapur, P. K. (2024a). Impact of inventory management practices on the operational performances of SMEs: Review and future research directions. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 15(5), 1934–1955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-023-02216-4

Seyedan, M., Mafakheri, F., & Wang, C. (2023). Order-up-to-level inventory optimization model using time-series demand forecasting with ensemble deep learning. Supply Chain Analytics, 3, 100024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sca.2023.100024

Spieske, A., & Birkel, H. (2021). Improving supply chain resilience through Industry 4.0: A systematic literature review under the impressions of the COVID-19 pandemic. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 158, 107452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107452

Varela, M., Lopes, P., & Rodrigues, R. (2021). Rigour in the management case study method: A study on master's dissertations. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.34190/ejbrm.19.1.2072

Wilhelm, K. (2026). Advancing rigor in operations management qualitative research: From proceduralism to reflexive reasoning. Journal of Operations Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.70051

Zhou, X., Shen, W., & Yu, Y. (2023). Inventory control strategy: Based on demand forecast error. Modern Supply Chain Research and Applications, 5(2), 74–101. https://doi.org/10.1108/MSCRA-02-2023-0009