Umpan Balik Korektif Tertulis Pada Siswa Kelas Menulis Paragraf Di UPGRISBA

Authors

  • Sherly Veronica Universitas PGRI Sumatra Barat, Padang, Sumatra Barat, Indonesia
  • Armilia Riza Universitas PGRI Sumatra Barat, Padang, Sumatra Barat, Indonesia
  • Riny D Sani Universitas PGRI Sumatra Barat, Padang, Sumatra Barat, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71456/ecu.v1i2.215

Keywords:

Menulis paragraf, Umpan balik koreksi tertulis

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apa saja tipe - tipe umpan balik dosen di kelas menulis paragraf. Jenis penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian descriptive melalui pendekatan qualitative. Dalam penelitian ini peneliti menggunakan document untuk penelitian. Ada 79 dokumen tertulis siswa di kelas menulis paragraf, tetapi peneliti hanya memilih 34 dokumen tugas  siswa sebagai sumber data dalam penelitian ini, karena peneliti mempertimbangkan beberapa aspek,  ketika  memilih paragraf harus memenuhi kriteria paragraf seperti kalimat topik, informasi pendukung dan kesimpulan. Lalu, beberapa tulisan anak dan tugas belum diberikan feedback oleh dosen dieliminasi oleh peneliti karna tidak memenuhi kriteria. Data didapatkan dengan melakukan observasi ceklis (observation checklist) yang telah diisi oleh peneliti sendiri untuk mengecek hasil dari koreksi tulisan dosen kepada siswa yang berkaitan dengan tipe - tipe umpan balik koreksi tertulis di kelas paragraph writing. Peneliti menemukan beberapa tipe umpan balik yang digunakan oleh dosen, yaitu umpan balik korektif tidak langsung sebanyak 0,50%, umpan balik korektif terfokus sebanyak 0,41% dan umpan balik korektif langsung sebanyak 0,07%. Dari ketiga jenis umpan balik korektif tertulis tersebut, umpan balik korektif tidak langsung paling banyak diterapkan oleh dosen.

References

Aripin, N., & Rahmat, N. H. (2022). Are Writers Metaconscious when they Write? A Look at Genders. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(4), 1–15.

Ellis, Rod. “A Framework for Investigating Oral and Written Corrective Feedback” Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Vol. 32 No. 2, 2010.

Ellis, Rod. “A Typology of Written Corrective Feedback Types”. English Language Teaching Journal. Vol. 63, 2009

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4624888

Truscott , J. (1996). “The Case against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes”. Language Learning Article. Vol. 46, 1996, 239.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-01

How to Cite

Veronica, S., Riza, A., & Sani , R. D. (2023). Umpan Balik Korektif Tertulis Pada Siswa Kelas Menulis Paragraf Di UPGRISBA. EduCurio: Education Curiosity, 1(2), 285–290. https://doi.org/10.71456/ecu.v1i2.215

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Maret-Juni 2023

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Sherly Veronica, Armilia Riza, Riny D Sani

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

License and Copyright Agreement

  1. Authors retain copyright and other proprietary rights related to the article.
  2. Authors retain the right and are permitted to use the substance of the article in their own future works, including lectures and books.
  3. Authors grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  4. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post or self-archive their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.