Penggunaan Transitivity System Dalam Argumentative Paragraph Siswa
Keywords:
Paragraf Argumentative, Transitivity systemAbstract
Argumentative Paragraph merupakan salah satu tugas menulis di perguruan tinggi. Dalam menulis paragraf argumentatif, penulisan harus mendefinisikan gagasan dan pandangan penulis terhadap suatu masalah disertai dengan alasan dan bukti yang logis. Serta bagaimana penulis menguraikan ide untuk membangun makna melalui pilihan tata bahasa juga menjadi hal yang penting dalam menulis argument. Penelitian ini mengkaji tentang kualitas paragraf argumentatif siswa dengan menggunakan sistem transitivitas. Data dikumpulkan secara kualitatif dengan instrumen dokumen ceklis. Temuan menunjukkan berdasarkan kualitas struktur 8 paragraf memenuhi kualitas relevancy, 10 paragraf memenuhi kualitas acceptability, dan 2 paragraf memenuhi kualitas adequary. Dan berdasarkan proses transitivity system, secara keseluruhan peneliti menemukan 80 proses material, 16 proses mental, 12 proses relational, 10 proses eksistensial, dua proses verbal dan 1 proses behavioral. Sehingga dapat disimpulkan kualitas menulis paragraf argumentatif siswa masih tergolong rendah karena sebanyak dua belas siswa tidak memenuhi semua struktur utama paragraf argumentatif. Dan delapan siswa yang memiliki kualitas relevansi memiliki proses material yang dominan. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa kualitas mereka dalam menulis paragraf argumen tidak hanya baik berdasarkan struktur tetapi juga berdasarkan sistem transitivitas dalam mengkonstruksi suatu peristiwa melalui pengalaman, siswa mampu mengungkapkan masalah yang terjadi ke dalam teks argumen.
References
Ahmad, Z. (2022). Negotiating Meaning Relationships in the Rhetorical Structure of EFL Argumentative Writing through Text Cohesion. Education Quarterly Reviews, 5(3), 523–533. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.05.03.564
Almurashi, W. A. (2016). An Introduction to Halliday’s Systemic Functional Linguistics. Journal for the Study of English Linguistics, 4(1), 70. https://doi.org/10.5296/jsel.v4i1.9423
Freeman, J. B. (2006). Argument Strength , the Toulmin Model , and Ampliative Probability Hunter College of The City University of New York. 26(1), 25–40.
Gerot, L., & Wignell., P. (1995). 文字Chapter_1. Anna Univ, Litr Rvw, Scope of Thesis, Tarascon 2010, 1–12.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2013). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar: Fourth edition. In Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar: Fourth Edition. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203431269
Jumariati, Febriyanti, E. R., & Rizki, M. (2021). Argumentation Skills: An Analysis on EFL Students’ Essays Based on Toulmin’s Model of Argument. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Education, Language, Literature, and Arts (ICELLA 2021), 587(Icella), 86–95. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211021.013
Junaidah Januin, W. H. O. (2021). Analysing ESL Persuasive Essay Writing Using Toulmin’s Model of Argument. Psychology and Education Journal, 58(1), 1810–1821. https://doi.org/10.17762/pae.v58i1.1034
Knapp, P., & Watkins, M. (2005). genre, text, grammar technologies for teaching ang assessing writing. 1–258.
Marbun, L. A. Y. (2016). Process Types of Transitivity System in t he National Geographic ’ s Articles. The Episteme Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 3(1), 1–24.
Mufidah, I. R. (2020). The Quality of Arguments Made by EFL University Students in Their Conceptual Papers. 8(4), 52–60.
Nassaji, H. (2015). Qualitative and descriptive research: Data type versus data analysis. Language Teaching Research, 19(2), 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815572747
Nurkholidah, Siti, E., Sutopo, Djoko, Widhiyanto, & Widhiyanto. (2019). The Realization of Transitivity Systems in Undergraduate Learnersâ€TM Argumentative Essay Texts. English Education Journal, 9(4), 450–458. https://doi.org/10.15294/eej.v9i4.31677
Owusu, E. (2020). Are Paragraph Theories Array of Impressions? Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 14, 53–68. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2020.14.04
Özdemir, S. (2018). The Effect of Argumentative Text Pattern Teaching on Success of Constituting Argumentative Text Elements. World Journal of Education, 8(5), 112. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v8n5p112
Ozfidan, B., & Mitchell, C. (2020). Detected difficulties in argumentative writing: The case of culturally and linguistically saudi backgrounded students. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7(2), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/382
Parveen, H., & Showkat, N. (2017). Quadrant-I ( e-Text ). July.
Rahmawati, U. (2019). Process Types of Transitivity in Recount Text Written By Eleventh Graders of Isat-U Senior High School Philippines in Academic Year 2018/2019. Journal of Research on Applied Linguistics, Language, and Language Teaching, 2(1), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.31002/jrlt.v2i1.366
Sundari, H., & Febriyanti, R. H. (2021). The Analysis of Indonesian EFL Argumentative Writing Using Toulmin’s Model: The Structure and Struggles from the Learners. Scope : Journal of English Language Teaching, 5(2), 67. https://doi.org/10.30998/scope.v5i2.8544
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Febbiyo Fajria Salsa, Edwar Kemal, Siska
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
- Authors retain copyright and other proprietary rights related to the article.
- Authors retain the right and are permitted to use the substance of the article in their own future works, including lectures and books.
- Authors grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post or self-archive their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
