A Descriptive Study on the Integration of Technology and Contextual Learning in Supporting Students’ Speaking Skill

Authors

  • Diva Salsabila* English Language Education, Language Arts and Vocational, University PGRI Pontianak, Indonesia
  • Desi Sri Astuti English Language Education, Language Arts and Vocational, University PGRI Pontianak, Indonesia
  • Dian Shinta Sari English Language Education, Language Arts and Vocational, University PGRI Pontianak, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71456/ecu.v4i3.2403

Keywords:

Technology Integration, Contextual Learning, Speaking Skill

Abstract

This study aims to describe the integration of technology within the Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) approach in English speaking instruction and to examine how this integrated implementation contributes to the improvement of students' speaking skills at SMA Negeri 01 Anjongan. This study employed a descriptive qualitative method involving purposively selected students from Class XI A. Data were collected through classroom observations and semi-structured interviews with students. The findings indicate that integrating technology into the CTL approach enhances speaking instruction by providing meaningful contextual learning experiences, increasing student engagement, and encouraging active participation in speaking activities. The integration also creates a more authentic and interactive learning environment, which enhances students' confidence and motivation to communicate in English. These findings suggest that the integration of technology within the CTL approach is an effective instructional strategy for developing students' speaking skills at the secondary school level, particularly in non-urban educational settings. This study is expected to serve as a reference for English teachers in designing more interactive, meaningful, and contextually relevant speaking instruction.

References

Bahastika, I., Sekti, R. P., & Trisakti. (2025). Vygotsky’s constructivist approach in the use of the boardgame Codenames in extracurricular art education. Wacana: Jurnal Bahasa, Seni, dan Pengajaran, 9(2), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.29407/jbsp.v9i2.3

Bates, A. W. (2022). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning (3rd ed.). Tony Bates Associates Ltd. https://pressbooks.bccampus.ca/teachinginadigitalagev3m/

Brown, H. D. (2014). Principles of language learning and teaching (6th ed.). Pearson Education.

Chapelle, C. A. (2016). Teaching culture in introductory foreign language textbooks. Teaching Culture in Introductory Foreign Language Textbooks, 1–263. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-49599-0

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2024). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Godwin-Jones, R. (2021). Evolving technologies for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 25(3), 6–26. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/73443

Harmer, J. (2015). The practice of English language teaching (5th ed.). Pearson Education.

Ilyas, M., & Putri, M. E. (2025). The impact of a YouTube-assisted contextual-based e-module on EFL learners’ speaking skills. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 13(4), 2103–2114. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v13i4.15321

Jannah, N. M., Afrezah, N. N., & Margana, M. (2023). Pedagogical potential of immersive technology for English speaking learning. Diksi, 31(2), 214–223. https://doi.org/10.21831/diksi.v31i2.59666

Johnson, E. B. (2014). Contextual teaching and learning: What it is and why it’s here to stay. Corwin Press.

Kessler, G. (2018). Technology and the future of language teaching. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12318

Limbong, S., Palayukan, N., Djajasasana, E. E., & Tandibura, F. (2024). Can contextual teaching and learning (CTL) revolutionize cadets’ speaking skills in maritime English? Voices of English Language Education Society, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v8i2.26651

Liunokas, Y. (2023). The efficacy of using contextual teaching and learning (CTL) approach in teaching speaking to Indonesian English as foreign language (EFL) students. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 11(2), 1334–1342. https://doi.org/10.24256/IDEAS.V11I2.4679

Marlinda, S., Susilowati, P., Hilaliyah, T., & Hasani, A. (2025). Meta-analysis of instructional media to enhance writing skills in Indonesian language education. Wacana: Jurnal Bahasa, Seni, dan Pengajaran, 9(2), 198–207. https://doi.org/10.29407/jbsp.v9i2.8

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage Publications.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage Publications.

Richards, J. C. (2022). Teaching listening and speaking: From theory to practice. Cambridge University Press.

Sari, D. S., & Astuti, D. S. (2023). The role of technology in English classroom: Exploring teachers' and students' perspectives. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, 12(2), 145–158.

Stanley, G. (2017). Language learning with technology: Ideas for integrating technology in the classroom. Cambridge University Press.

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2020). Metode penelitian kualitatif: untuk penelitian yang bersifat eksploratif, interpretif, interaktif, dan konstruktif. Alfabeta.

Thornbury, S. (2016). How to teach speaking. Pearson Education.

Yuliantini, N. (2026). Enhancing EFL Speaking Fluency and Confidence through ChatGPT Voice in Contextual Learning at Madrasah Aliyah. Jurnal Iman Dan Spiritualitas, 6(1), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.15575/JIS.V6I1.54377

Downloads

Published

2026-08-06

How to Cite

Salsabila, D., Astuti, D. S., & Sari, D. S. (2026). A Descriptive Study on the Integration of Technology and Contextual Learning in Supporting Students’ Speaking Skill. EduCurio: Education Curiosity, 4(3), 492–500. https://doi.org/10.71456/ecu.v4i3.2403