The Impact of Multimodal Vocabulary Instruction On The Acquisition And Retention of English Vocabulary Among Young EFL Learners In Rural Settings

Authors

  • Helmi Universitas Achmad Yani, Banjarmasin, Kalimantan Selatan, Indonesia

Keywords:

Multimodal Vocabulary Instruction, English Vocabulary, Rural Setting

Abstract

This study investigates the effectiveness of multimodal vocabulary instruction in enhancing the acquisition and retention of English vocabulary among young English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners in rural educational settings. Utilizing a quasi-experimental design, the research involved a sample of [insert number] participants from [insert location], who were divided into experimental and control groups. The experimental group received instruction incorporating a variety of sensory modalities, including visual aids, audio resources, and interactive activities, while the control group received traditional vocabulary instruction methods. Pre- and post-assessment measures, including vocabulary tests and retention assessments, were administered to both groups. The results demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in vocabulary acquisition and retention among the participants who received multimodal instruction. Additionally, qualitative data gathered through interviews and observations provided insights into the learners' engagement and preferences for multimodal approaches. This research contributes to the growing body of literature on effective pedagogical strategies for EFL learners, particularly in under-resourced rural contexts, emphasizing the value of multimodal instruction in enhancing vocabulary learning outcomes. Implications for classroom practices and recommendations for further research are discussed.

References

Anderson, R. C., & Nagy, W. E. (1991). Word meanings. In R. Barr, M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. 2, pp. 690-724). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Ellis, R. (1994). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press.

Gagne, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1992). Principles of Instructional Design. Wadsworth.

Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge University Press.

Plass, J. L., & Jones, L. (2005). Multimedia learning in second language acquisition. In R. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 467-488). Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice. Cambridge University Press.

Rieber, L. P., & Estes, R. S. (2010). The Past, Present, and Future of Instructional Technology. In K. Harris, S. Graham, & T. Urdan (Eds.), APA Educational Psychology Handbook: Volume 3. Application to Learning and Teaching (pp. 245-265). American Psychological Association.

Schmitt, N. (2008). Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 329-363.

Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 235-253). Newbury House.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-13

How to Cite

Helmi. (2023). The Impact of Multimodal Vocabulary Instruction On The Acquisition And Retention of English Vocabulary Among Young EFL Learners In Rural Settings. EduCurio: Education Curiosity, 2(1), 98–104. Retrieved from https://yptb.org/index.php/educurio/article/view/668

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): November 2023

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Helmi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

License and Copyright Agreement

  1. Authors retain copyright and other proprietary rights related to the article.
  2. Authors retain the right and are permitted to use the substance of the article in their own future works, including lectures and books.
  3. Authors grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  4. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post or self-archive their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.