Self Evaluation Management in Learning Improvement at the Darussalim Islamic Boarding School
A Case Study of the PDF Wustho Program
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71456/jis.v4i2.1861Keywords:
Self Evaluation Management, Learning Improvement, Islamic Boarding School, PDF WusthonAbstract
Self evaluation is a crucial tool in Islamic education management for achieving continuous improvement in the quality of learning and institutionalizing the value of muhasabah. This study aims to conduct an in-depth analysis of the implementation of self evaluation management in efforts to improve learning in the Formal Diniyah Education Program (PDF) Wustho at the Darussalim Islamic Boarding School. The research method employed was a qualitative case study using data collection techniques through triangulation, which included in-depth interviews, participatory observation, and document analysis involving leaders, administrators, educators, and administrative staff. The research findings indicate that self evaluation has been conducted periodically through semesterly coordination meetings involving all levels of the organization, where active discussions take place to identify the program’s strengths and weaknesses. However, the effectiveness of its implementation remains hindered by the absence of standardized assessment instruments and a data management system that is still dominated by manual methods. It is concluded that although evaluation practices have been carried out routinely, there is a significant gap between conventional methods and the demands of modern educational management. Therefore, a transformation is needed through the digitization of information systems and the standardization of evaluation instruments to support data-driven decision-making for the measurable optimization of student learning quality.
References
Antariksa, W. F., Fattah, A., & Utami, M. A. P. (2022). EVALUASI PROGRAM PENDIDIKAN PESANTREN MAHASISWA MODEL CIPP (CONTEXT, INPUT, PROCESS, PRODUCT). Evaluasi: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 6(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.32478/evaluasi.v6i1.848
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. [Textbook]. Sage publications. https://books.google.co.id/ books?hl=id&lr=&id=DLbBDQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Lihat+Creswell,+J.W.+%26+Poth,+C.N.+Qualitative+Inquiry+and+Research+Design:+Choosing+Among+Five+Approaches+(5th+Ed.)+%7C+2024+ntitative+and+Qualitative+Research+(7th+Ed.)+&ots=-iu51dFQNy&sig=JeyHGmy5JtTxztTIrbRe9uiUeos&redir_esc =y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. (2019). Al-Qur’an dan Terjemahannya Edisi Penyempurnaan 2019. Lajnah Pentashihan Mushaf Al-Qur’an. https://pustakalajnah.kemenag.go.id/detail/135
Khaerudin and Munadi, Sudji. (2020). Pengembangan Model Evaluasi Internal Program Pembelajaran Pondok Pesantren Modern. [Thesis S3, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta]. https://eprints.uny.ac.id/70135/
Khuriyah, K., Zamroni, Z., & Sumarno, S. (2016a). PENGEMBANGAN MODEL EVALUASI PENGELOLAAN PONDOK PESANTREN. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(1), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i1.7529
Khuriyah, K., Zamroni, Z., & Sumarno, S. (2016b). PENGEMBANGAN MODEL EVALUASI PENGELOLAAN PONDOK PESANTREN. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(1), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i1.7529
Lexy J. Moleong penulis. (2018). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif / penulis, Prof. DR. Lexy J. Moleong, M.A.. Bandung :: PT Remaja Rosdakarya,.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2019). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage Publications. https://www.amazon.com/ Qualitative-Data-Analysis-Methods-Sourcebook/dp/150635307X#
Mukhlis, M. H., & Wahyudi, H. (2024). Evaluasi Diri dan Perencanaan Kerja Pendidikan untuk Peningkatan Mutu di Pondok Tahfizh Quran Hadits Rabbany Kota Pekanbaru. Journal of Practice Learning and Educational Development, 4(3), 151–157. https://doi.org/10.58737/jpled.v4i3.289
Mukhlisin, L., Martiana, D. S., Armandio, M. D., & Herwina, W. (2023). Penerapan Model Evaluasi CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) pada Program Pelatihan Balai Latihan Kerja Komunitas (BLKK) Amanah Kota Tasikmalaya. JURNAL PENELITIAN, 7(1). https://unars.ac.id/ojs/index.php/cermin_unars/article/download /2802/2101
Muyasaroh, M., & Sutrisno, S. (2014). PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN EVALUASI CIPP PADA PROGRAM PEMBELAJARAN TAHFIZ AL-QUR’AN DI PONDOK PESANTREN. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 18(2), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v18i2.2862
Nilan, P. (2009). The ‘spirit of education’ in Indonesian Pesantren. British Journal of Socio logy of Education, 30(2), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690802700321
Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Sage Publications. https://us2.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/the-art-of-case-study-research/book4954
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Zhang, G. . (2017). The CIPP evaluation model: How to evaluate for improvement and accountability. Guilford Publications. https://books.google.co.id /books?hl=id&lr=&id=Y1LgDQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Stufflebeam,+D.+L.,+%26+Zhang,+G.+(2017).+*The+CIPP+evaluation+model:+How+to+evaluate+for+improvement+and+accountability&ots=pWcllPd7go&sig=fY2xnW00jzbxKO7NhSwK66RIU8c&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Stufflebeam%2C%20D.%20L.%2C%20%26%20Zhang%2C%20G.%20(2017).%20*The%20CIPP%20evaluation%20model%3A%20How%20to%20evaluate%20for%20improvement%20and%20accountability&f=false
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian: Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D / Prof. Dr. Sugiyono (27th ed.). Bandung : Alfabeta,.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.) (Vol. 6). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://us2.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/case-study-research-and-applications/book250150
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Ridho, Nur Shobah, Annida Afifah, & Muhdi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.








